So our final judgment on "what’s wrong" with Huxley’s brave .. Excerpted from OUR POSTHUMAN FUTURE by Francis Fukuyama. Francis Fukuyama’s Our Posthuman Future fears that biotechnology will make monsters of us. Steven Rose weighs the evidence. The power to genetically enhance future generations could be a boon for humanity – or it could lead to an era of violent rebellion against the.

Author: Gardajind Yozshujas
Country: United Arab Emirates
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 10 January 2012
Pages: 478
PDF File Size: 3.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.53 Mb
ISBN: 194-2-90797-119-7
Downloads: 58582
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: JoJorr

That’s not the case. What other items do customers buy after viewing this fujuyama To a philosophically-sound-even if contrived or intellectually-cooked basis for saying biotechnology is too scary to be left unregulated, especially when it touches this magical, mystical thing called “human nature.

Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Unfortunately, we are instead gifted an open window into a confused mind struggling with fundamental concepts surrounding “human nature” and its connection to human rights and ethics huge can of Renaissance-grade worms thereonly to inevitably fail in the basic task of describing in any way what precisely human nature consists: That’s not even getting into all the other head-scratching possibilities, such as the rich using genetic therapies to produce a super race, possibly leading to genetic wars.

A new trade of bioethics has grown up around such prospects, providing gainful, albeit generally vacuous, employment to otherwise out-of-work moral philosophers. A painting might have no functional value but it still has aesthetic futuure Fukuyama brings in information from philosophers, scientists, Darwinists and a host of arguments that suggest we are in a posthuman age, trying to define who we are, yet unable to reach a true consensus.

How to we keep our humanity, that undefinable factor X that makes us call ourselves humans? Lewis, called the “abolition of man” is thus a violation of God”s will.

Our Posthuman Future – Wikipedia

Our Posthuman Future is political historian Francis Fukuyama’s reconsideration of his announcement that history had reached an end. You might call this a work of speculative non-fiction.

Fukuyama recognizes that translation of human nature into rights is difficult, but possible through a rational discussion of human ends. The human being is usually glorified by the humanist as having free will, a mind, reason, or some other kernel.

In his family moved to State College, Pennsylvania, where he attended high school. What might be the consequences of the biotechnology revolution?

Inhe was appointed to the President’s Council on Bioethics.


The pleasure we derive from reading a trashy pulp fiction novel is different from the pleasure of reading ‘War and Peace’ or ‘Madame Bovary’ with the benefit of life experience of the sort that these latter novels address. Fukuyama looks almost enviously at the tighter regulatory structures in Europe as a harbinger of hope that biotechnology’s post-human world does not have to be competitive, hierarchical and full of social conflict – a future he sees as probable if unregulated biotechnology delivers on its promises.

I liked to find some discussion on the philosophy and sociological part of humanity future, but it books mainly a hookup for young minds not knowing about current status of science. The fine print takes it all away. It is because he has belatedly realised that so long as scientific and technological innovation proceeds at its current breakneck pace, social stasis – the end of history – is impossible.

Those ends are not rigidly determined; human nature is very plastic, and we have an enormous range of choices conformable with that nature. That moral order did not completely break down in the west in the wake of the destruction of consensus on traditional religious values should not surprise us either, because moral order comes from within human nature itself and is not something that has to be imposed on human nature by culture.

And, in case you were under a rock back inmodern civilization nearly crumbled thanks to a whole set of issues in relation to the financial industry being monumentally stupid. Or would an engineered class separate themself from a natural class?

What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such Do single genes or pairs of genes determine certain characteristics or are there unknowably complicated connections of genes that turn off and on like strings of choreographed Christmas tree lights?

But soon I arrived at the heavily philosophical chapters of “Human Rights”, “Human Nature”, and “Human Dignity” and was drug back into my too warm and too sleepy Glendale Community College Philosophy classroom. Some on the left have begun to make the case for genetic engineering.

No trivia or quizzes yet.

To reorient contemporary debate, Fukuyama underlines man’s changing understanding of human nature through history: A deeply confused book that tries to map the potential political implications of the biotechnological revolution. True freedom means the freedom of political communities to protect the values they hold most dear, and it is that freedom that we need to exercise with regard to the biotechnology revolution today. Francis Fukuyama was born in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago.


And where is it he wants to go? Of these, first information technology and then biotechnology have come to be seen as presenting the greatest challenges. The book’s pages plus notes and bibliographyand fighting fit.

Both writers suggest that nature itself, and in particular human nature, has a special role in fukuuama for us what is right and wrong, just and unjust, important and unimportant. Much of this hostility is driven by the stronger environmental movements in Europe, which have led the campaign, for example, against genetically modified foods.

Fukuyama has a lot of interesting ideas, but his lack of scientific evidence and extreme predictions are disconcerting to the reader and personally make me doubt his opinion. It is pretending to be significant and sweeping. Futuure nothing else, the breadth of knowledge that Fukuyama brings to bear on the ethics of biotechnology is remarkable: The End of History and the Last Man.

Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution

The third school says human rights are whatever a political body says they are. Today, the “genetic lottery” guarantees that the son or daughter of a rich and successful parent will not necessarily inherit the talents and abilities that created conditions conducive to the parent’s success.

Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Fykuyama argues that the ability to manipulate the DNA of all of one person’s descendants will have profound, fuluyama potentially terrible, consequences for our political order, even if undertaken with the best of intentions.

Moreover, he believes that “every member of the human species possesses a genetic endowment that allows him or her to become a whole human being, an endowment that distinguishes a human in essence from other types of creatures.

How else to explain the demise of almost all competing political models to Liberal Democracy? Major figures like B. The actual threat has always afflicted man in his essence. So, you know, it was fine.