ECONOMIC OFFENCES INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION ACT 1974 PDF
Preamble1 – ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, Section1 – Short title, extent and commencement. Section2 – Chapter Act Info: ECONOMIC OFFENCES (INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION) ACT, . [Act, No. 12 of ]. PREAMBLE. An Act to provide for the inapplicability of. Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, , Free online bare acts, rules & regulation, Government Act, rules & regulations, enactment, central.
|Published (Last):||17 February 2017|
|PDF File Size:||17.59 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Depending upon severity of punishment econnomic period of limitation varies from six months to three years after which there shall be a bar to taking cognizance of offence. It is also not in Thanks a lot, Sushilji.
Username Password Not a member yet? An application for bail was moved by him before the Special Economic Offences Court on the said date itself, the contents whereof are as under: Commission of Sati Prevention Actwas passed by Parliament setting down various offences relating to the commission of Sati and the trial of S TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal And Another v. Section of the Act provides that no person shall be proceeded against for certain offences including offence under As there was delay in conducting the investigation and filing of charge-sheet and disposal of certain interlocutory applications, the High Court of Bombay was Heard the learned counsels for the parties. Airport in Tata Indica Car bearing registration No.
The filing of the return by the first petitioner-company for the assessment Bombay High Court Therefore, the Trial Court has The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, upon the complaint, took cognizance of the offences and issued process to the petitioners.
economic offences act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
The offence complained of, b Avinash sir Very nice information provided in this article. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this writ petition briefly stated are: Karnataka High Court Chandrachud for respondents Nos. The petitioners have filed the present application for quashing the order dated March 18,passed by the Special Subordinate Judge, Economic OffencesPatna, taking cognizance of the offence under Anz Grindlays Bank And Others… v.
By the said enactment the legislature has excluded the applications of the The appellants in these appeals were accused of offences From To Being aggrieved, the appellant Bank and its officers have filed Civil Appeals Nos.
Badri Prasad And Anr. Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange. State Of Goa v.
These are the allegations in brief in the complaint filed by the respondent. Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0. Mohan A very comprehensive information and clarification on very important issue. The prayer in this original petition is to call for the records in CC.
Ribu Kurian Ninan v. Criminal miscellaneous case is disposed of in the above terms The mere fact that the detaining authority proceeded with more than ordinary despatch in Jammu and Kashmir High Ecknomic The detention order dated 10 October, was served on the petitioner’s The Government of Andhra Pradesh passed G.
Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation) Act, 1974
Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Strictly speaking, this matter does not involve either economic offences or offencespunishable under the Therefore, the period of limitation mentioned in section of the Code would not apply as is clear from the inapplicability of limitation mentioned in the Economic Offences Act While he was in jail he made an application for granting of bail under Section CrPC on Thanks a lot Dada.
R Yellagowd And Others.