JOS GUILHERME MERQUIOR PDF
This essay surveys and assesses J. G. Merquior’s principal English‐language contributions to liberal social and political theory. The greatest. Foucault has 44 ratings and 5 reviews. Ahmad said: Foucault, c, Jose Guilherme Merquior ( – )Foucault (; second edition ) is a b. José Guilherme Merquior has 20 books on Goodreads with ratings. José Guilherme Merquior’s most popular book is Foucault.
|Published (Last):||2 March 2004|
|PDF File Size:||9.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. But its conceptual muddles and explanatory weaknesses and mark: Meerquior endorsed many of Merquior’s criticisms of Foucault, and wrote that Merquior was uos correct to conclude that Foucault “embraces nihilism. Vitor rated it really liked it Jul 03, Paperbackpages.
Merquior was a major supporter of the Fernando Collor de Mello government and wrote many of Collor’s public speeches. Cover of the first edition. Retrieved from ” https: Carrette – – Routledge.
Thus in the end, far from counting by itself, as research or insight, his history stand or falls with his Weltanschauung – and therefore falls. British Journal of Sociology.
José Guilherme Merquior
Foucault’s historical evidence is too selective and distorted, his interpretations Merquior sums-up most of his views on p. Geoff Danaher – – Sage Publications. Sara Mills – – Routledge. This page was last edited on 8 Decemberat Merquiorr page was last edited on 13 Augustat Return to Book Page.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. A second edition was published in Added to PP index Total downloads 2of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Print Hardcover and Paperback. Merquior notes, for example, that in Foucault’s first major book, Madness and Civilizationhe argued that in Europe before the Enlightenment madness was relegated to the fringes of society but nonetheless seen as a type of divine wisdom engaged in dialogue with, and pointing out the foibles of, society.
Paul Sparks rated it really liked it Dec merquir, Johnson called it one of Merquior’s “minor classics. Jay Corbetto rated it really liked it Dec 04, Mohammad Mahdi Fallah rated it it was ok Nov 29, Open Preview See a Problem?
Foucault received praise from several scholars, but has also been criticized. History of Western Philosophy. Foucault’s historical evidence is too selective and distorted, his interpretations too sweeping and too biased.
Foucault was first published by Fontana Press, an imprint of HarperCollinsin Discussing The History of SexualityMerquior writes that Foucault’s views about sexual repression are preferable to those of Wilhelm ReichHerbert Marcuseand their followers, in that they have “the advantage of descriptive, if not explanatory, realism”, and that Foucault is supported by “the latest historiographic research on bourgeois sex”.
Published by Fontana paperbacks first published Merauior rated it it was amazing May 20, In other projects Wikiquote. Yuri SS rated it it was uos Oct 09, Merquior provides a largely negative evaluation of Foucault’s work.
To ask other readers questions about Foucaultplease sign up. He considers the book’s second two volumes to be of higher scholarly quality than the first, and finds Foucault to be “original and insightful” in his discussion of the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius and other Stoics in The Care of the Self.
Foucault (Merquior book) – Wikipedia
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. McHoul – – University of Otago Press. Encompassing all of Foucault’s published work, this book provides an array of secondary literature about Foucault including his philosophical history, his debts to other thinkers, and his complex relationship to Merquiorr structuralism.
Jon Simons – – Routledge. Views Read Edit View history. Foucault, Education, the Self and Modernity. Allen Severino rated it really js it Apr 09, Machala Machala rated it liked it Sep 01, To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Ellis called Foucault the best general account of Foucault’s oeuvre while Gregory R.